De-oiling for plant-based protein extraction

ABSTRACT

A method and system provides for for de-oiling and extracting protein from chickpeas prior to generating chickpea protein concentrate. The method and system includes receiving a chickpea flour generated from the chickpeas, including having cortex material removed from the chickpeas and generating an ethanol mixture by mixing the chickpea flour with ethanol to remove at least a portion of the oil content from the chickpea flour. The method and system includes separating the ethanol mixture into a de-oiled chickpea flour and an ethanol recycling stream having organics from the chickpea flour absorbed therein. Therein, the method and system includes extracting a protein concentrate from the de-oiled flour.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a continuation of, and claims priority to,U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/014,882 entitled “DRY FRACTIONATIONFOR PLANT BASED PROTEIN EXTRACTION” filed Feb. 3, 2016, which is acontinuation-in-part of, and claims priority to, U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 14/997,744 entitled “ETHANOL DE-OILING FOR PLANT BASED PROTEINEXTRACTION” filed Jan. 18, 2016, which is a continuation-in-part of, andclaims priority to, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/694,341 entitled“PLANT BASED PROTEIN EXTRACTION METHOD AND SYSTEM” filed Apr. 23, 2015.

COPYRIGHT NOTICE

A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material,which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has noobjection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent documentor the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and TrademarkOffice patent files or records, but otherwise reserves all copyrightrights whatsoever.

FIELD OF INVENTION

The disclosed technology relates generally to processing plant-basedfood items for the extraction of protein and more specifically to amethod and system for extracting protein, and other outputs, fromchickpeas.

BACKGROUND

Modern food processing trends provide for greater access tomacronutrients naturally present in foods. With the growth of consumerdemand for high quality food, there is a related growth for improvedfood processing techniques to extract high-quality macronutrientsconsistent with consumer beliefs.

For example, it is common for users to require food sources to beorganic and composed of ingredients that are non-genetically modified(non-GMO). Another example are consumers seeking to avoid particularfood sources, such as consuming a plant-based diet.

In addition to demand for food types being driving by consumer choice,such choices are additionally fueled by consumer intelligence toallergic or inflammatory responses. It is not uncommon for a person toan some adverse reaction to a food source, with severity of reactiondiffering widely between consumers.

Amongst the macronutrients, protein remains the quintessentialmacronutrient for the promotion of growth and health maintenance. Whileprotein is readily available and commonly found in many food sources,extraction as a supplement for manufactured food sources can beproblematic in seeking specialized solutions.

A common protein supplements from non-plant based sources is wheyprotein, usable as an example of the concerns of modern protein sourcemanufacturing. The quality of the protein product is directly related tothe quality of the original source of protein, thus problems can arisefrom the quality of the original source. Another problem is whey proteinis unavailable to vegan and other non-plant-based consumers.

Another problem is that protein quality and other attendant factors aredirectly affected by the manufacturing/extraction process. One attendantfactor can be the absorption factor of the protein by the user, whetherthe protein is a quickly-digestible/absorbing protein.

The most common form of plant-based protein is soy protein. Whileserving several market needs, there exists a need for a wider variety ofprotein-types and a greater degree of stability in the protein itself.For example, consumers can have allergies or other inflammatoryresponses from the protein source.

The chickpea is a readily-available plant-based protein source lackingknown consumer allergies. Chickpea protein has a long history a largedegree of stability in food processing. Based on the dynamics of thechickpea itself, there is limited technology exists chickpea proteinextraction. Existing techniques require heavily structured processes,including operations within very narrow ranges and complicatedprocessing steps.

As such, there exists a need for a method and system to efficientlyextract high quality protein from chickpeas.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION

A method and system provides for for de-oiling and extracting proteinfrom chickpeas prior to generating chickpea protein concentrate. Themethod and system includes receiving a chickpea flour generated from thechickpeas, including having cortex material removed from the chickpeasand generating an ethanol mixture by mixing the chickpea flour withethanol to remove at least a portion of the oil content from thechickpea flour. The method and system includes separating the ethanolmixture into a de-oiled chickpea flour and an ethanol recycling streamhaving organics from the chickpea flour absorbed therein. Therein, themethod and system includes extracting a protein concentrate from thede-oiled flour.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a system forgenerating chickpea protein concentrate.

FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of a wash station of the system ofFIG. 1.

FIG. 3 illustrates another embodiment of a wash station of the system ofFIG. 1

FIG. 4 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of a method forgenerating chickpea concentrate.

FIG. 5 illustrates another embodiment of a portion of the system forgenerating chickpea protein concentrate of FIG. 1.

FIG. 6 illustrates steps of embodiment of the method for generatingchickpea protein concentrate.

FIGS. 7a and 7b illustrate one exemplary embodiment of a system forgenerating chickpea protein concentrate.

FIG. 8 illustrates a block diagram of a de-oiling processor prior toprotein extraction.

FIG. 9 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a de-oilingprocessor.

FIG. 10 illustrates a block diagram of another embodiment of a de-oilingprocessor.

FIG. 11 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of an ethanolrecycling loop for use in conjunction with the de-oiling processor.

FIG. 12 illustrates a block diagram of one embodiment of a dryfractionation system.

FIG. 13 illustrates multiple embodiments of the dry fractionationsystem.

FIG. 14 illustrates multiple embodiments of protein extraction using dryfractionation.

FIG. 15 illustrates another embodiment of protein extraction using dryfractionation.

A better understanding of the disclosed technology will be obtained fromthe following detailed description of the preferred embodiments taken inconjunction with the drawings and the attached claims.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 illustrates a system 100 including a first mixer 102, a firstseparator 104, a second separator 106 and a second mixer 108. The systemfurther includes a third separator 110, a wash station 112, a thirdmixer 114, a homogenizer 116, a pasteurizer 118, a vacuum evaporator 120and a dryer 122.

FIG. 1 illustrates one embodiment of a process flow operation forgenerating the chickpea concentrate as described herein. In thisembodiment, the process described herein makes the product of a chickpeaconcentrate.

The first mixer 102 receives flour, water and a base. In one embodiment,the flour is chickpea flour, but it is recognized that other suitabletypes of flour may be utilized. In this step, via the mixer, the flouris hydrated and there is a pH shift to solubilize the protein asolid-liquid extraction.

It is within the scope of the present invention that varying types ofchickpea flour or the protein-based input ingredient(s) may be utilized,where the process described herein may be modified to account for suchvariations in the mixer 102 input. For example, the chick-pea flour maybe a de-oiled flour, such that further processing operations describedbelow for performing de-oiling operations may be omitted. For example,the flour may be pre-treated with a hexane extraction process, or otherprocess to modify or adjust the physical composition of the flour, forexample, as described in further detail in FIGS. 8-10 below.

In one embodiment, in the mixer 102, hydration of the flour includeswater ratio ranges between 5-12:1 depending on equipment and desiredpurity of end product. While varying ranges may be utilized, thisembodiment includes a low-end ratio is found to be 4:1, with a high-endratio dependent upon capacity of drying operations noted below. In oneembodiment, operational temperature range is between 4-60 C depending onembodiment of final product attribute, including generating a pH between8-11. The mixer 102, in this embodiment, operates using low shearconditions. Similarly, this embodiment uses a reaction time between30-60 min depending on holding conditions.

It is noted that the above ranges and conditions, as well as ranges,conditions and values noted within the present specification, areexemplary in nature of the various embodiments. The ranges andconditions are not limiting of the disclosed invention, whereinoperations aspects outside the noted ranges may be utilized in theprotein extraction process, as recognized by one skilled in the art.

Based on the mixing operations, the mixer outputs an initial alkalizedslurry. The initial alkalized slurry is then transported to the firstseparator 104. As described in further detail below, the initialalkalized slurry may be transported using a low sheer pump, but it isrecognized that any suitable pump may be utilized.

The first separator 104 separates the initial alkalized slurry into astarch precipitate and a solubilized protein rich steam. The separator104, in one embodiment, is a decanter centrifuge. The starch precipitateis extracted and in one embodiment can be discarded. The solubilizedprotein rich stream is further processed to a second separator 106.

In one embodiment, solubilized protein rich stream may be transferred tothe separator 106 using a low-sheer pump, but any other suitable pumpmay be utilized.

The solubilized protein rich stream is separated using, in oneembodiment, with the separator 106 being a disk-stack centrifuge toremove cream fraction. The centrifuge output includes a concentrated oilcream and a de-oiled solubilized protein rich stream. The concentratedoil cream may be discarded or otherwise processed.

In one embodiment, separator 110, wash station 112 and mixer 114 may beomitted from the process flow, whereby the de-oiled protein rich streamcan be passed through filters to extract functional proteins. It isrecognized that other processing or extraction steps may be utilizedaside from the examples noted herein. Wherein, the extracted proteinsare then subject to further processing steps described herein.

Whereas, the present processing system therein transfers the de-oiledsolubilized protein rich stream to a second mixer 108. An acid isadditionally added into the second mixer 108.

Within the second mixer 108, the combination of de-oiled solubilizedprotein rich stream and the acid generates a protein precipitate. Inthis second mixer tank 108, acid is added to iso-electricallyprecipitate the protein. In one embodiment, temperature ranges between20-75 C depending on the yield of protein extracted in the separationstep using the first separator. The lower the temperature, the morenative the protein will stay and the higher acid soluble loss. At hightemps, higher yields and loss of some functionality will occur. Oneembodiment provides for pH level to be between 4.0-4.8 depending ontemperature profile. Within the second mixer 108, in this embodiment,agitation level is low to promote flocculation. The acid type can bedependent on equipment and desired end functionality of protein.

The combination in the second mixer 108 generates the proteinprecipitate composed of a serum and an acid curd. The proteinprecipitate is provided to a third separator 110. In one embodiment, theprotein precipitate is fed by a low-shear pump to the third separator110, being a decanter centrifuge, to separate the serum from the acidcurd. The serum protein is extracted, leaving a first protein curdtransferred to the wash station 112.

Within the wash station 112, water is added to acid curd to rehydratethe mixture. The water is added via a water mixer to generate acid curdslurry. The wash station further includes wash separator that is, in oneembodiment, fed by low-shear pump to the decanter centrifuge to separatethe serum from the acid curd. The wash separator therein generates asecond protein curd. Further embodiments of the wash station aredescribed relative to FIGS. 2-3 below.

Once the process completes one or more washing operations, a third mixer114 receives the protein curd output, as well as a base, water and anenzymatic cocktail (protease). In one embodiment, within the mixer 114,the protein curd is hydrated between 90 and 70% moisture. The proteincurd is step-wise neutralized to a final pH of 6.5-7.5. Varyingstep-wise pH adjustments, temperature, and hold times for the mixer arespecific to optimal enzymatic reactivity.

In one embodiment, for desired native proteins in the final product, theenzymes are not added.

The third mixer 114 output is a neutral hydrolyzed protein slurry. Ahigh pressure homogenizer 116 receives the slurry such that highpressure homogenization provides for texture, particle size control, andhomogenization of the slurry.

The high pressure homogenizer 116 generates an output of a homogenizedprotein slurry. This homogenized protein slurry is then pasteurizedusing the pasteurizer 118. In one embodiment, the pasteurizer performspasteurization at a minimum temperature of 60 C, having a hold time thatis dependent on pasteurizing temperature.

The pasteurization, via the pasteurizer 118, generates a pasteurizedprotein slurry. This slurry is fed into the vacuum evaporator 120. Inone embodiment, the vacuum evaporator's pressure, temperature and flowrate are dependent on the pasteurization setup of the pasteurizer. Forexample, in one embodiment having a high temperature (e.g., 240 F), thevacuum evaporator may include a 2 second hold time with direct steaminjection at a −0.5 bar pressure, with a 20 second hold time w/deltaT to130 degrees at half bar.

Water is removed using the vacuum evaporator 120, producing an output ofa cooled protein slurry. The vacuum evaporator 120 can operate invarious embodiments based on the desired properties of the cooledprotein slurry. For example, one embodiment may include higher orderprocessing operations to remove aromatics attendant in the pasteurizedprotein slurry. In this example, if the final protein concentrate isusable for food supplements having taste parameters, the removal of thearomatics, also referred to as the volatiles, helps eliminate anysubsequent aftertaste from the protein consumption. In other embodimentswhere the protein supplement may undergo further processing or combinedin a manner where aromatics are not problematic, a less efficientoperation of the vacuum evaporator 120.

In one embodiment the cooled protein slurry may include volatileelements based on the vacuum evaporation process not removing nativearomatics. In another embodiment, the cooled protein may not includethese volatile elements, as the elements are removed in the vacuumevaporation process.

The cooled protein slurry is fed into the dryer 122. The dryer 122performs drying operations to generate a dried protein concentrate.Different embodiments of dryer types and feed temperatures are dependenton one or more factors, including: pasteurization operations; evaporatorconditions; hydration level of neutralized protein slurry; andcharacteristics necessary to consumer application i.e bulk density,moisture level, particle size, and agglomeration.

Therein, the dryer 122 generates the dried protein concentrateoriginated from the flour, water and base originated in the first mixer102.

As described in further detail below, FIGS. 7a and 7b illustrate onespecific exemplary embodiment of chickpea protein generation using notedoperational values.

FIG. 2 illustrates one embodiment of wash station 112 of FIG. 1. In thisembodiment, the wash station 112 includes a wash mixer 140 and a washseparator 142. Within the wash station, water is added to acid curd torehydrate the mixture. The water is added via the water mixer 142 togenerate the acid curd slurry. In one embodiment, slurry moisture canrange from 98-75% depending on equipment and purity of final product andpH can range between 4.0 and 4.8 depending on temperature profile. Inone embodiment, the temperature can range between 20-75 C depending onprevious precipitation condition, desired degree of denaturation, yield,and desired purity of the protein concentrate. In the water mixer 140,agitation is low to further promote flocculation.

The wash station 112 further includes the wash separator 142 that is, inone embodiment, fed by low-shear pump to the decanter centrifuge toseparate the serum from the acid curd. The wash separator thereingenerates the second protein curd.

In different embodiments, the operations of the wash station may beiterated for further purity of the protein curd. For example, onetechnique may include a second wash station with the protein curdrehydrated and then fed by low-shear pump to another decanter centrifugeto further separate serum.

FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a wash station have multiple washmixers 150, 154 and multiple wash separators 152, 156. As illustrated,the output of the first wash separator 152 is fed directly into a secondwash mixer 154. The second wash mixer combines the separator 152 outputwith water, generating the washed protein slurry. This slurry is fedinto the second wash separator 156 to generate the second protein curd.

FIG. 2 illustrates the wash station 112 having a singlemixing/separating stage, whereas FIG. 3 illustrates multiplemixing/separating stages. It is recognized that the wash station 112 mayinclude any number of mixing and separating stages, providing higherdegree of second protein slurry clarity consistent with operationalguidelines, operational efficiency and desired quality of the proteinconcentrate extracted from the dryer 122 of FIG. 1.

FIG. 4 illustrates one embodiment of a flowchart of steps of a methodfor generating a chickpea concentrate. The method described herein maybe performed using the system 100 of FIG. 1, whereas it is recognizedthat the steps may be performed using any other suitable machine orapparatus for performing the described operation.

A first step, step 200, is generating an initial alkalized slurry bycombining flour, water and base. As described above, the flour is achickpea based flour.

In one embodiment, instead of chickpea flow feed stock, wet-milled whilechickpeas can be used and fed directly to the wet process. In anotherembodiment, an air classified protein concentrate can be used. It isrecognized that various other embodiments exist such that based onpreceding processing conditions, a chickpea flour-type input in somemanner or another, is fed into the system.

A next step, step 202, is generating a solubilized rich protein streamby separating the initial alkalized slurry. This step may be performedusing a separator, wherein in one embodiment the step includes theremoval of a starch precipitate from the slurry.

A next step, 204, is generating a de-oiled solubilized rich proteinstream by separating the solubilized rich protein stream. This step maybe performing using a separator, including generating a concentrated oilcream as well as the de-oiled solubilized rich protein stream.

A next step, step 206, generating a protein precipitate including anacid curd by mixing the de-oiled solubilized rich protein stream with anacid and separating the acid curd from the protein precipitate. Thisstep may be performed using the second mixer 108 as described above.

A next step, step 208, is washing the first protein curd using a washstation to generate a second protein curd. As described in furtherdetail below, this step may include iterative washing operations,generating the second protein curd.

A next step, step 210, is generating a neutral hydrolyzed protein slurryby mixing the second protein curd with a base and water. This step maybe performed using the third mixer of FIG. 1 above.

A next step, step 212, is generating a homogenized protein slurry fromthe protein slurry. The homogenization may be performed using a highpressure homogenizer as described above.

Therefrom, step 214, is generating a cooled protein slurry bypasteurizing the homogenized slurry. The protein slurry may be cooledusing a vacuum evaporator, similar to the evaporator 120 of FIG. 1 withoperations conditions as described above.

In various embodiments, the cooling of the protein slurry can beperformed to varying degrees generating varying quality levels of cooledprotein slurry. Using a higher order of evaporating, undesired aromaticsmay be extracted from the protein slurry.

Step 216 is extracting the protein concentrate from the cooled proteinslurry. This step may be performed using a dryer performing dryingoperations, extracting water as the byproduct of the drying process.Therein, in this embodiment, the method provides the extracting ofprotein concentrate from chickpea flour.

FIG. 5 illustrates one embodiment of a portion of the system of FIG. 1.The illustrated embodiment of FIG. 5 includes the first mixer 102, thefirst separator 104 and the second separator 106. Whereas, in thisembodiment, the outputs from the first mixer 102 is transferred to thefirst separator using a low sheer pump 240. Similarly, the output of thefirst separator 104 is transferred to the second separator 106 using alow sheer pump 242. In one embodiment, a positive displacement pump canbe used to achieve low shear conditions. An example of this pump is theWaukesha Universal II Pump, Model 130-U2 available from WaukeshaCherry-Burrell in Delavan Wis.

FIG. 6 illustrates a flowchart of one embodiment of further operationsof the wash step 208 of FIG. 4. The steps of FIG. 6 may be performedusing the elements of FIG. 2 or FIG. 3 described above.

A first step, step 300, is hydrating the protein curd in a wash mixer togenerate a washed protein slurry. A next step, step 302, is separatingthe moisture from the washed protein slurry. In the methodology of FIG.6, a determination is made if there are further washing iterations, step304.

In the event further washings are requested or required, step 306 istransferring the output of the wash mixer from the wash separator intoanother wash mixer. Thereupon, the method re-iterates to step 300. Inthe event the determination of step 304 is that no further washing isrequested or required, the method reverts to step 308, outputting thesecond protein curd. Therefore, the methodology allows for the iterativewashing of the protein curd, if desired.

FIGS. 7a and 7b illustrate a processing flowchart of one exemplaryembodiment of a chickpea protein extraction process. While noted withexemplary values, the embodiment of FIGS. 7a and 7b , including theexemplary values, are not limiting in nature as varying processingvalues may be readily utilized, as recognized by one skilled in the art.

The process begins in FIG. 7a , wherein 1000 kg Chickpea flour 402 isliquefied with 5000 kg water 404 using a liquefier 406. The combinedslurry enters a first reaction tank 408 in which the pH is adjusted to11 using aqueous sodium hydroxide 410, temperature at 55 C and heldunder low shear conditions for approximately 75 minutes. Using the firstdecanter 412, approximately 1300 kg of wet starch 414 is then extractedand the protein rich liquid is passed through a 3-phase cream separator416. This cream separator extracts approximately 230 kg of concentratedoil 418.

The de-oiled protein stream from the 3-phase cream separator 416 thenpasses into a second reaction tank 420, in which the pH is adjusted to4.0 using aqueous phosphoric acid 422, temperature at 55 C, and heldapproximately 75 minutes. From the second decanter 420, 3950 kg aqueoussugars and acid soluble proteins 426 are removed to the light phase.From the second decanter 420, the protein curd is then provided to athird reaction tank 420, rehydrated to 10% dry solids with 1200 kg water430 at 55 C. If necessary, the pH is adjusted back to 4.0 using aqueousphosphoric acid 432 and held for approximately 75 minutes.

The rehydrated protein rich slurry is then passed through a thirddecanter 434, removing approximately 1250 kg of serum 2 consisting ofprimarily aqueous sugars 436. A fourth reaction tank 438 receives thesecond acid curd from the third decanter 434, combines with 400 kg ofwater at 50 C 440, to achieve a 15% dry solid mixture. The pH isadjusted to approximately 6.8 using calcium hydroxide 442 and then aprotease cocktail 444 is added to cleave the proteins for endapplication.

In this embodiment, the enzymatic reaction is allowed to take place forapproximately 30 min under low shear conditions and fed to a HighTemperature/Short Time pasteurizer 446 to kill any microbial andterminate the enzymatic reaction.

The slurry is then fed to a vacuum evaporator 448 to increase the solidslevel. The output of the evaporator 448 is then spray dried using spraydryer 450. Wherein, in this embodiment, the process obtains 190 kg of ahydrolyzed protein concentrate 452 at minimum 80% protein.

FIG. 8 illustrates one embodiment of another technique for generatingplant-based protein extraction by de-oiling the material prior to theprotein extraction process. The elements of FIG. 8 provide forpre-processing of the flour, as illustrated in FIG. 1, but include theremoval of oil, sugars and other organics within the flour.

The embodiment of FIG. 8 includes a de-oiling processor 502, asdescribed in further detail in FIG. 9. The de-oiling processor receivesthe food element from which the protein is extracted. In the exemplaryembodiments of FIGS. 8 and 9, the food source is chickpeas, but as notedherein, any other suitable type of food source may be utilized. Via thede-oiling process, the processor 502 generates de-oiled flour 504.

Similar to the process of FIG. 1, the de-oiled flour is therein providedto the mixer 102, along with water and a base to generate the initialalkalized slurry. Where the de-oiling processor 502 includes a flourmill, the de-oiled flour 504 may be the same flour input as noted inFIG. 1. If the processor 502 uses a roller mill/flaker, additionalmilling may be required to convert the flakes to a powder format usableas a direct input to the mixer 102.

With respect to the processing operation described above in FIG. 1, theinclusion of the de-oiling processor thereby modifies the FIG. 1processes flow. Whereas in FIG. 1, the solubilized protein rich streamis fed to the separator 106 to remove a cream fractionation, this stepis therefore extraneous. Rather, where the separator 106 de-oiled thesolubilized protein rich stream, this stream is in this embodimentwithout oil. Thus, the solubilized protein rich stream is fed directlyto the mixer 108 as illustrated in FIG. 1.

With respect to the above-noted operational aspects of the system ofFIG. 1, these operational ratios and flow rates are based on a functionof water solubility. The de-oiling process of the processor 502therefore does not material change the operational ratios noted aboveand therefore in one embodiment the same operational ratios for theembodiment of FIG. 8 may be utilized in FIG. 1.

FIG. 9 illustrates one embodiment of the de-oiling processor 502 of FIG.8. In the exemplary embodiment, the de-oiling is performed using adecortication device 510, a milling or roller-flaker 512, a mixer 514,decanter centrifuge 516 and a dryer 518.

The decortication device 510, mixer 514, decanter centrifuge 516 anddryer 518 may be any suitable device operative to perform the processingoperations described herein, as recognized by one skilled in the art.The milling/roller-flaker 512 represents one of several varyingembodiments operative within the present system. The device 512 may be aroller mill/flaker that is operative to process the decorticatedchickpeas and generate flakes. The device 512 may, in anotherembodiment, be a flour mill operative to mill flour instead of flakes.

The decortication device 510 receives the chickpeas, which can beprovided raw. The device 510 operates to remove the cortexes from thechickpea, removing the outer hull and exposing the protein-rich insides.The device 510 generates cortex waste 522, which can be discarded. Thedevice 510 further outputs the chickpeas having the shells or cortexesremoved to the milling/roller-flaker device 512.

The milling/roller-flaker device 512 operates to mill the chickpeas intoa milled or flour feedstock. In one embodiment, instead of being milledto a particular powder, the device 512 may flake the chickpeas to adesignated flake size, such as in one exemplary embodiment having flakesin the range of 0.25 mm to 0.4 mm, but such range is not limiting innature. Whether the device 512 is a flaker or a miller, the output 526still includes its oil. As noted herein, the flake ranges of 0.25 mm to0.4 mm are exemplary ranges, but not express limiting ranges. It isrecognized that smaller flake size may be utilized up until the flakeshave a powder consistency. It is further recognized that larger flakesmay be utilized where larger flakes may require further processing forefficient de-oiling.

As part of the de-oiling process, the mixer 514 therein mixes the flour526 with ethyl alcohol 528, more commonly referred to as ethanol. Themixture of the ethanol with the flour provides for removal of the oilfrom the flour in accordance with known oil-extraction techniques. Themixer 514 may be an immersion or ethanol-wetting tank, which may includea mixing element to saturate the flour with ethanol. It is recognizedthat one embodiment uses pure ethanol herein, but other variations ofethanol may be utilized including ethanol mixed with other liquids,including have a water concentration or other mixture recognized by oneskilled in the art, including for example ethanol recovered from arecycling loop as described below in FIG. 11.

The mixer 514 output is a mixture 530 of the flour and ethanol. Thedecanter centrifuge 516 receives the mixture 530 and therein extractsethyl alcohol recycling stream 532, consistent of ethyl alcohol withoils, sugar and other organics absorbed therein. The extractor 516additionally generates the de-oiled flour 534 with remaining ethanol. Inthis embodiment, the flour mixture 534 is a wet mixture, which is thenprovided to the dryer 518.

The desolventizing dryer 518 therein dries the flour mixture to removefinal amounts of ethanol. A dryer output includes ethanol vapor 536,which can be collected and condensed for recirculation back to the mixer528. The dryer also outputs the de-oiled flour 504, which is then madeavailable to the mixer 102, as noted in FIG. 8 and FIG. 1.

FIG. 10 illustrates another embodiment of the de-oiling processor 502.This embodiment, includes the decortication device 510,milling/roller-flaker 512 and dryer 518, but instead uses acounter-current extraction unit 540. By way of example, the unit 540 maybe a Crown Countercurrent solvent extraction unit, manufactured by CrownIronworks, Roseville, Minn.

Similar to the operations of FIG. 9, the decortication device 510generates waste 522, as well as the input to the milling/roller-flaker512. Depending on whether the device 512 is a roller miller/flaker or aflour mill, the output is either flakes or flour, having oil containedtherein.

In this embodiment, the counter-current extraction unit 540 receives theflake/flour plus oil mixture 526. Performing operations consistent withcountercurrent extraction, the device 540 therein generates two outputs.Ethanol recycling stream 532 is the first output stream and de-oiledflour with ethanol 534 is the second stream. Therein the dryer 518generates the ethanol vapor and de-oiled flour 504.

It is recognized that for embodiment of FIGS. 9 and 10, where the device512 is a roller mill/flaker, the described flour includes flakes. Theseflakes are then further processed by a flour mill prior to insertioninto the mixer 102 of FIGS. 1 and 8. Moreover, for ease of terminology,where described in FIGS. 9 and 10, describing flour after device 512,such description includes flakes relating to embodiments employing theflaker instead of the flour mill.

The dryer 518 of FIG. 9 and FIG. 10 may additionally include varyingembodiments not expressly illustrated. For example, one dryer 518 typemay be an air/nitrogen air-flow dryer that generates the de-oiled flour.Another embodiment of the dryer 518 may be a vacuum dryer. Anotherembodiment may utilize a desolventizing toaster in operation with thevacuum dryer.

The variances of elements noted in FIGS. 9 and 10 provide for a largenumber of varying embodiments. It is within the scope of this processfor utilizing any variation of the devices 512, 514, 516, 518 and 540.For example, one embodiment may include a roller miller/flaker 512 witha mixer 514, decanter centrifuge 516 and a vacuum dryer 518. Forexample, another embodiment may include a flour mill 512, acountercurrent extraction unit 540 and an air-nitrogen air-flow dryer518. Such examples are illustrative in nature only and not limiting.

Therein, the process of decortication with milling and/or roller-flakingof the feedstock and ethanol-based extraction results in efficientprocessing of the protein source while preserving the food grade natureof all fractions. The above embodiment is described with chickpeas, butis also operable on other members of legume family, as well as anysuitable feedstock having an oil content.

FIG. 11 illustrates one embodiment of an ethanol recycling loop usablewith the processor 502 of FIGS. 8-10. The recycling loop receives theethanol recycling stream 532, consisting of oil extracted from thematerial, ethanol and sugar. A distillation column 560 separates theinput 532 into azeotropic ethanol 562 and concentrated oil, sugar andother organics 564. In one embodiment, molecular sieves may be used toextract water from the ethanol 566. Such ethanol can then be recycledback to the mixer 528 of FIG. 9 and/or the countercurrent extractionunit 540 of FIG. 10.

In FIG. 11, a mixer 568 receives both the concentrated oil and sugar 564as well as water 570. A disc stack centrifuge 572 receives the mixtureand output purified oil 574 and sugar and water mixture 576. A dryer 578dries the input 578 to produce water vapor 580 and molasses 582. In oneembodiment, an optional enzymatic process may be performed prior to thedryer 578. Regardless, in the system of FIG. 11, the ethanol 566 can berecycled and re-used in the de-oiling process. It is recognized by oneskilled in the art that further variations of the recycling operationsmay be utilized.

Further processing of the protein source provides for the improvement ofyield and purity of the protein concentrates. As described herein, theexemplary protein source is chickpea, but any other plant-based proteinsource may be utilized. The present processing is not expressly limitedto chickpeas, but using chickpeas as one exemplary embodiment. FIG. 12illustrates one embodiment of a system for improving protein concentrateyields and purity, complimentary to the systems and methods describedabove. The system 600 of FIG. 12 may operate prior to the mixer 102 asnoted above in FIG. 1. The system 600 of FIG. 12 may additionallyreceive de-oiled protein flour, such as flour 502 generated from thede-oiled processor 502 described above.

The system 600 includes a mill 602 and an air classifier system 604. Themill 600 may be any suitable milling device, such as by way of exampleof a jet mill, hammer, pin or any other suitable device recognized byone skilled in the art. The air classifier 604, as described in furtherdetail below, may be one or more air classification systems operative toprocess and classify the concentrate output within a definedclassification range.

In the operation of the system 600, the mill 602 receives the de-oiledflour 504 and generates milled de-oiled flour 606. In an exemplaryembodiment, the particle size can range between 5 and 100 micron, but itis recognized that any other suitable particle size range is within thescope herein. It is further noted that while the system 600 illustratesthe mill 602 receiving the de-oiled flour 504, the mill may additionallyprocess flour not having been subjected to the de-oiling process ofFIGS. 9-11, such that generated milling output 606 would then be milledflour instead of milled de-oiled flour 606.

The air classifier 604 therein performs air classification operations,such as described in FIG. 13 below. The classification process thereingenerates a protein concentrate 608, which with respect to theabove-described protein extraction process, may then be received by themixer 102, along with water and base to produce the initial alkalizedslurry. It is recognized that in the embodiment where the proteinconcentrate 608 is from the milled de-oiled flour, the subsequentprocessing of FIG. 1 therein excludes creamer 106 similar to thede-oiled embodiment described above. It is further noted that in someprotein sources having a high oil content, the oil content can disruptthe efficiency of the milling process by causing the mill to operate ata slower pace to avoid getting gummed up, such that by de-oiling theflour to lower its oil content, and remove attendant moisture, themilling operations can operate more efficiently, as well as eliminateoil removal processing operation(s) at later protein extractionstage(s).

For clarity of terminology, as described herein, the air classificationtechnique generates varying outputs of protein concentrates. Bycomparison, the protein extraction process, such as described hereinincluding FIG. 1 for example, generate protein concentrate product. Theprotein concentrates from the air classification systems undergo furtherprocessing to generate the protein concentrate product. Therefore, inreference to air classifications, the protein concentrates are the airclassification output, separate from the protein concentrate product.Whereby, it is noted that the protein concentrate product, as generatedherein, may be sold or otherwise distributed for consumption orprocessed for manufacturing of food products. Similarly, the proteinconcentrates from the air classifier(s) may additionally be sold orotherwise distributed for consumption or processed for manufacturing offood products.

FIG. 13 illustrates multiple embodiments of the air classifier 604, aswell as the exemplary jet mill 620, as one embodiment of the mill 602 ofFIG. 12. The mill 620 receives the flour 504, generating milled flour606. A first air classifier 622 receives the milled flour 606 togenerate a first protein concentrate 624. By way of example, theclassifier 622 may be a Netzch Model CFS30 manufactured by Netzch Inc.of Exton, Pa. The classifier 622 may have a designated percentage targetsplit of to fines based on desired protein concentrate. In this example,the light fraction in the first air classifier 622 may be between 15%and 50% split. The air classification generates the protein concentrate624 and a starch concentrate 626, using known air classificationtechniques.

In one embodiment, the starch concentrate 626 is then re-fed back to theair classifier 622 for further refinement and processing.

In one embodiment, the generation of the protein concentrate 624 maytherein be sufficient for the protein extraction process describedabove. Whereas, further refining the protein concentrate 624 produces ahigher purity level of the protein concentrate used for the wet process.For example, if the protein concentrate 624 is fed to another airclassifier, this can improve the purity level by extracting furtherstarch concentrate, leaving a higher purity level in the proteinconcentrate.

In further embodiments, additional processing of the starch concentrate626 and further air classifiers may produce higher yields of proteinconcentrate. In one embodiment, the air classifier 604 includes a secondair classifier 628, which receives an input of the starch concentrate626. The second air classifier 628 therein performs further airclassification operations to generate a second protein concentrate 630,which extracts further protein from the starch concentrate 626,improving the yield of protein concentrate from the flour 606. In oneembodiment, the concentrate 630 may then be added into the proteinextraction process along with the first protein concentrate 624.

The second air classifier 628 additionally generates a second starchconcentrate 632. This second starch concentrate 632 may be feed back tothe first air classifier 622 for further refinement. In an additionalembodiment, the starch concentrate from an air classifier may be fedback to the mill 620. For example, starch concentrate 626 from the firstair classifier 622 may include particles whereby the protein was notsufficiently removed from the starch granules in a first pass. Thereby,in this embodiment, reprocessing the starch concentrate 626 back throughthe mill 620 can improve protein capture yields.

In a further embodiment, any suitable number of air classifiers may beused, illustrated here as air classifier N 634, where N may be anysuitable integer. For example, to maximize yield, a process may includefour or five air classifiers operating to generate the proteinconcentrate, such as concentrate 636. It is recognized that additionalair classifiers operate on the starch concentrate produced by theprevious air classifier, so it there is a degree of diminishing returnsfor producible yield using multiple air classifiers on starchconcentrates. Similarly, while not expressly illustrated in FIG. 13,additional air classifiers may be used on the protein concentrate 624,630 and/or 636 to improve the purity of the protein concentrate.

By way of example, one embodiment may include the first air classifier622 generating a concentration split of 15-50% by feed mass to thestarch concentrate 626 and the protein concentrate 624 can be greaterthan 45%. The second air classifier 628 may additionally split 15-50% byfeed mass to the starch concentrate 632 and protein concentrate 630 canbe greater than 55% purity. A third air classifier 634 may generate thesame split of 15-50% to the starch concentrate and protein puritygreater than 65%. The further air classification of the starchconcentrate improves yield by separating additional protein concentrate.

Similarly, in one embodiment, a range for the split by weight betweenthe protein concentrate 624 and the starch concentrate 626 may beapproximately 35% by weight of the protein rich fraction, the proteinconcentrate 624 and approximately 65% by weight of the starchconcentrate 626, plus or minus 15% each. Therein, in this embodiment,the concentration of the protein concentrate 624 may be 65% protein on adry basis with a range of +/−15%. In this embodiment, the proteinconcentration of the starch concentrate may be 10%+/−5%. Therefore, thisair classification process may be repeated one or more times to furtherextract additional protein concentrate, to improve yield and/or purity.For example, the protein concentrate 624 can be further air classifiedto remove particles finer and lighter than the protein at a split ofapproximately 3-10% to fine fraction. Upon further air classification,the starch concentrate may be ash, such as fibers, inorganic materialsor other matters, or other insoluble materials, leaving the higherpurity protein concentrate.

FIG. 14 illustrates several embodiments for processing the proteinconcentrate 608. As noted above, the concentrate 608 may be proteinconcentrate 624 by itself of in combination with concentrates 630 or 630and 636, in various embodiments illustrated in FIG. 13. A mixer 640receives the concentrate 608, water, acid and enzymatic cocktail. In oneembodiment, the enzymatic cocktail includes enzymes and is composed of acarbohydrate specific cocktail, such as by way of example pectinase,amylase, gluco-amaylase, cellulose, or any other suitable mixturerecognized by one skilled in the art.

The mixer 640 mixes the liquids and provides the mixture to a centrifuge642. In one embodiment, the centrifuge 642 separates the mixture into awater and sugar output 644, leaving protein rich curd 646. The proteinrich curd 646 may then be further processed for protein extraction, asdescribed in further detail below.

In another embodiment, the input to the mixer 640 may omit the enzymes.The mixture of the protein concentrate 608, water and acid is then fedto the centrifuge 642. Where the centrifuge 642 extracts the sugar andwater 644, the protein rich curd output is then provided to a secondprocessing stage 648. In this embodiment, the second processing stage648 includes a second mixer 650 and a second centrifuge 652. The proteinrich curd is mixed in the second mixer 650 with an acid, and feed to thecentrifuge 652. Sugar and water is extracted, to generate a secondprotein rich curd 654 output. Similar to the protein rich curd 646, thecurd 654 is then further processed for protein extraction.

With respect to FIG. 1, the processing techniques of FIGS. 14-15 areintegrated therein. Varying embodiments of protein extraction using theair classification utilize the FIG. 1 processing system 100, includingadditional or further refinements of the process. For example, withrespect to FIG. 14, mixer 640 may operate similar to the mixer 108,therein additionally receiving the enzyme mixture. The centrifuge 642operates similar to the separator 110, generating the rich protein curd646, referred to as first protein curd with reference to FIG. 1 above.The wash station 112 of FIG. 1 may operate consistent with the secondprocessing stage 648 of FIG. 12, as further described in FIG. 2 above.Such that the protein rich curd 654 may be consistent with the secondprotein curd of FIG. 1.

The protein rich curd 646 and/or 654 may be provided to the mixer 114,which includes an enzyme cocktail as noted above.

FIG. 15 illustrates another embodiment for processing the proteinconcentrate as generated consistent with one or more embodiments above.A mixer 680 receives the protein concentrate 608 along with water and abase. The mixture is fed to a centrifuge 682, whereby starch 684 isextracted. With starch extracted, a solubilized protein rich stream 686is then fed to a second mixer 688. Within the mixer 688, the stream 686is combined with acid. The output of the second mixture is fed to asecond centrifuge 690, whereby sugar and water is extracted to generatethe protein rich curd 692.

FIG. 15 illustrates a similar commonality with the system of FIG. 1,where the mixer 680 operates consistent with the mixer 108 of FIG. 1,having the input of water and base, instead of acid. By replacement ofacid with a base, the centrifuge 682 operates similar to the separator110, to extract the protein curd 686, which is similar to the firstprotein curd of FIG. 1. The mixer 688 and centrifuge 690 operatessimilar to the wash station 112 of FIG. 1, whereby the protein rich curd692 is similar to the second protein curd of FIG. 1.

Similar to the embodiments of FIG. 14, the curd 692 is then furtherprocessed for protein extraction, consistent with the above-describedtechniques. For example, the curd 692 may be fed to the mixer 114 ofFIG. 1 with the inclusion of an enzyme cocktail.

As noted herein, wherein the described embodiment of an extraction unitis a centrifuge, it is recognized that any other suitable extraction orseparator device may be utilized and the technique herein is notexpressly limited to using a centrifuge.

Therefore, the above air classification technique provides for improvingprotein yield usable for protein extraction from plant-based source(s)such as chickpeas, other legumes and other like feedstocks. A maximumprotein concentration is reached in which no further protein can beconcentrated without sacrificing yield, or in various embodiments amaximum cannot be overcome due to particles or agglomerates having thesame mass cannot be separated in a dry media. The present techniquetherein introduces materials into a solvent to separate materials byother physio-chemical properties.

It is recognized that varying the processing conditions noted aboveadjusts the output volume and concentrate levels. Whereas within thescope of the present invention, reducing processing time or reducingingredient combinations may generate reduced concentration levelsacceptable for varying industrial or commercial uses. Similarly,refinements may include increased quality or other attributes of theprotein concentrate, such as digestibility, after taste/aromatics,consistency, mouth-feel, by way of example. As such, the varyingoperational variations are within the scope of the present invention andthe noted example and ranges above are exemplary and not limiting intheir disclosure.

In addition the method and system described herein, the present methodand system additionally allows a chickpea concentrate made by theprocess described herein. The chickpea concentrate is made, in variousembodiments, using the above described methods and systems.

Therefore, the present method, system and chickpea concentrate overcomesthe limitations of the prior art by allow for the utilization ofchickpea as a vital protein source. The method and system incorporatevarying operational guidelines, such as acidity levels, processingtimes, flow rates, temperature ranges, to generate the herein describedchickpea concentrate.

FIGS. 1 through 15 are conceptual illustrations allowing for anexplanation of the present invention. Notably, the figures and examplesabove are not meant to limit the scope of the present invention to asingle embodiment, as other embodiments are possible by way ofinterchange of some or all of the described or illustrated elements.Moreover, where certain elements of the present invention can bepartially or fully implemented using known components, only thoseportions of such known components that are necessary for anunderstanding of the present invention are described, and detaileddescriptions of other portions of such known components are omitted soas not to obscure the invention. In the present specification, anembodiment showing a singular component should not necessarily belimited to other embodiments including a plurality of the samecomponent, and vice-versa, unless explicitly stated otherwise herein.Moreover, Applicant does not intend for any term in the specification orclaims to be ascribed an uncommon or special meaning unless explicitlyset forth as such. Further, the present invention encompasses presentand future known equivalents to the known components referred to hereinby way of illustration.

The foregoing description of the specific embodiments so fully revealsthe general nature of the invention that others can, by applyingknowledge within the skill of the relevant art(s) (including thecontents of the documents cited and incorporated by reference herein),readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specificembodiments, without undue experimentation, without departing from thegeneral concept of the present invention. Such adaptations andmodifications are therefore intended to be within the meaning and rangeof equivalents of the disclosed embodiments, based on the teaching andguidance presented herein.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method for de-oiling and extractingprotein from chickpeas prior to generating chickpea protein concentrate,the method comprising: receiving a chickpea flour generated from aplurality of chickpeas; generating an ethanol mixture by mixing thechickpea flour with ethanol to remove at least a portion of the oilcontent from the chickpea flour while absorbing at least a portion oforganics from the chickpea flour into the ethanol mixture; separatingthe ethanol mixture into a de-oiled chickpea flour and an ethanolrecycling stream having the at least a portion of the organics from thechickpea flour absorbed in the ethanol recycling stream; and extractinga protein concentrate from the de-oiled flour.
 2. The method of claim 1,further comprising: generating the chickpea flour using a roller milland flaker including removing a cortex material from the plurality ofchickpeas, whereby the flour includes flakes therein.
 3. The method ofclaim 2 further comprising: prior to extracting the protein concentrate,milling the de-oiled flour and the protein concentrate therefrom.
 4. Themethod of claim 1 further comprising: generating the chickpea flourusing a flour mill, including removing a cortex material from theplurality of chickpeas.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the mixing ofthe ethanol mixture is performed using a mix tank and the separating theethanol mixture is performed using a centrifuge.
 6. The method of claim1 further comprising: prior to extracting the protein concentrate,drying the de-oiled chickpea flour.
 7. The method of claim 6, whereindrying the de-oiled chickpea flour prior to extracting the proteinconcentrate is performed using at least one of: an air-flow dryer; avacuum dryer; and a desolventizing toaster in combination with a vacuumdryer.
 8. The method of claim 1 further comprising: feeding the ethanolrecycling stream to an ethanol recycling unit to extract the ethanoltherefrom.
 9. A method for extracting protein from a plant-based sourcematerial the method comprising: milling the plant-based source materialto generate a milled flour; generating an ethanol mixture by mixing themilled flour with ethanol; removing at least a portion of an oil contentof the plant-based source material from the mixing of the milled flourwith the ethanol; separating the ethanol mixture into a de-oiled flourand an ethanol recycling stream the ethanol recycling stream includingthe at least a portion of the oil content of the plant-based sourcematerial; milling the de-oiled flour to generate milled de-oiled flour;and generating a protein concentrate from the milled flour using an airclassifier.
 10. The method of claim 9 further comprising: processing theprotein concentrate to generate a protein rich curd; generating aneutral hydrolyzed protein slurry by mixing the protein rich curd with abase, an enzymatic cocktail, and water; generating a homogenized proteinslurry from the neutral hydrolyzed protein slurry; generating a cooledprotein slurry by pasteurizing the homogenized protein slurry; andextracting a protein concentrate product from the cooled protein slurry.11. A method for removing oil from a source material and generating aprotein concentrate, the method comprising: decorticating the sourcematerial, the source material having a protein and an oil contenttherein, the decorticating removing cortex material from the sourcematerial; creating a flour from the source material having the cortexmaterial removed therefrom; generating an ethanol mixture by mixing theflour with ethanol in a mix tank; removing at least a portion of the oilcontent from the flour using the ethanol mixture in the mix tank;removing at least a portion of sugars from the flour using the ethanolmixture in the mix tank; extracting a de-oiled flour from the ethanolmixture; extracting at least a portion of the ethanol from the ethanolmixture, the portion of the ethanol extracted from the ethanol mixtureincluding the oil content and the sugars removed from the flour; dryingthe de-oiled flour using at least one dryer; and extracting a proteinconcentrate from the de-oiled flour.
 12. The method of claim 11, whereinthe step of creating the flour is performed using a roller mill andflaker, whereby the flour includes flakes therein.
 13. The method ofclaim 12 further comprising: milling the de-oiled flour, which includesmilling the flakes therein.
 14. The method of claim 11, wherein creatingthe flour is performed using a flour mill.
 15. The method of claim 11,wherein the at least one dryer includes one or more of: an air-flowdryer; a vacuum dryer; and a desolventizing toaster in combination witha vacuum dryer.
 16. The method of claim 11 further comprising: feedingthe ethanol extracted from the ethanol mixture, in combination with theoil and the sugars, to an ethanol recycling unit to extract the ethanoltherefrom.
 17. The method of claim 11, wherein the source material ischickpeas.